I am a fan of recent resident residents. All of them are quality games that really get resident evil correctly. They are tense and frightening without losing the sprays, the writing style of the writing style that gave us some of the most famous lines in all games.
Is it impossible to prevent me from saying, “Where do everyone go? Bingo?”
While all three remakes are solid items in the series, it seems that it is widely accepted between the fans that a clear black sheep bunch is a remake of resident evil.
Now that it has been five years since its release, I look back at Resident Evil 3 kindly, but with a sense of Anticlimax. The feeling that it could be something really great if Capcom earned these elements, but for some reason not.
Effective experience
Something that caused the original resident evil 3: Nemesis excelled from its predecessors was the route that players could go through the game. In a handful of key moments, players got to choose what they wanted to do. For example, they could stand on the ground and fight Nemesis, the title monster that chases Jill throughout the game, or they could try to escape by escaping from the upcoming areas.
The elections did not always result in the main branch road we saw in games such as the dawn and quarry, But they added something unique to the experience that had not been seen in Resident Evil before. When the remake was announced, the fans were thrilled to see how Capcom implemented these options, and hopefully they would build some of them to create a larger story of the branch.
However, when Resident Evil 3 was launched, the fans were disappointed when they found out that instead of leaning into the possibilities that Resident Evil 3: Nemesis was unique, Capcom had completely cut them out of the game and decided for a completely linear experience that could only be completed in a few hours.
The basis of the Resident Evil series is playing games for various scenarios, ends and final stamps, but with Resident Evil 3, Capcom cut the heart of Resident Evil.
After the masterpiece
To repeat, Remake Resident Evil 3 is a good game that I would recommend to the fans of the horror of Survival. But he was included in an unfortunate position when Remake Resident Evil 2 had to follow just a year after his launch. Given how it turned out how outstanding Resident Evil 2, expectations were over the roof, when there was a resident evil 3, and fans hoped that Capcom would emphasize things that were great about Resident Evil 3: Nemesis, not to turn it into a shallower version of Resident Evil 2.
Because Remake Resident Evil 3 was unable to capture the same heights as its predecessor, he was considered a great disappointment. Resident Evil 3's subcutaneous aspects are much stunning due to the success of Resident Evil 2. When comparing games, Resident Evil 3 does not stand well against Resident Evil 2.
The main campaign of Resident Evil 2 is longer (despite the fact that the original is shorter than Nemesis), it has more bonus content and has a script B, which motivates the story. Even Nemesis, one of the main sales points for Resident Evil 3, was better at Resident Evil 2 with Mr. X's improved role and added Screenime.
At the time when Resident Evil 3 came out, it was as if we had seen everything he had to offer, and then some with the previous game. There is even a section where Carlos returns to the Racoon City police department, one of the main environment for Resident Evil 2. Many fans said that Remake Resident Evil 3 felt like DLC for Resident Evil 2, which was sold as a separate game. Now, five years later, this feeling did not disappear.
Over time, the weight of expectations was raised from the back of Resident Evil 3 and can enjoy it without luggage that appeared hot from the heel of Resident Evil 2. It is not a bad game by any section of imagination, unless you imagine it standing next to Resident Evil 2.
- Released
-
3rd April 2020
- Esrb
-
M for adults: blood and gore, intense violence, strong tongue
