The most pregnant, defective figures

There are many characters in video games that are hated. These characters are often designed around the illulation of this reaction to one or the other. Although the character may have unlikely features, this does not mean that the visceral hatred they receive is boring.

Some characters experience tangible growth that players refuse to recognize, others are misunderstood and several others are accused of sins of their games. These are characters that are certainly presented as unlikely one way or another, but which are largely not like some nice blows, or at least inconsistent, reasons. There are plenty here.

Grand Theft Auto 5: Trevor

Trevora unsaid is self -harmful

Trevor left Burtning's car in GTA 5 improved.

So, we'll clarify one thing. Trevor is Bastard. There are no two ways. He is a violent, nonsensical and chaotic man who always listens to disturbing thoughts. It has no sense of decency and it does not even have it twisted, villain honest code. It's just bastard. And he is You. He is how you play Grand Theft Auto.

How many times have you shot someone because you felt like? How many people did you escape from the road? How many people have you ripped out of cars? How many times have you crossed that person? Trevor was the most sensible integration he had ever added to the game.

Street Fighter Alpha: Dan Hibiki

Yes your eyes Do Deceive you

Dan Hibiki Street Fighter V is standing before his stage Alpha 3.


Mixcolage-25-DEC-2024-11-11-PM-284.JPG

Street Fighter Alpha 3


Released

May 29, 1999

Esrb

t



This is a fun input because Dan is an easily hateful figure on the surface. He likes to mock his opponent and has several ridicule. But while talking about speech, he is unable to walk a walk as it is, canonically, the weakest playable figure. And there are certainly players who hate Dan for these aspects of his personality. However, this is not the basic criticism of Dan; In fact, the primary reason is why some players hate it, bound to play.

The biggest problem that people with Dan have is that he is a “funny figure”, and therefore makes him “wasting a figure slot”. If you believe these things, you live in the past. For starters, Dan from Alpha Games was not specifically terrible. Those who were published at the age of 90. In fact, he was quite good in the street fighter 5 and has enough sauces to get some The tournament plays in Street Fighter 4.

Regarding criticism it's just a bad ryu, understand that Dan kicks don't work like tatsu at all. And its fiery ball can Look As a projectile, but in fact it is not a fireball. It's a pressure tool. It's much more similar to something like Hugo's Claks. Yes, he has Soryuken. However, half of the cast has a Shoryuken-Esque thrust. You hate Dan because you don't understand what you see, live in the past or lack the joy of your life.

I am fishing

The victim of the war of war

I'm fishing from Persona 5 The Phantom X.


Mixcollage-10-FEB-2025-03-29-am-9658.jpg

Persona 5

Systems

PlayStation-1

Released

September 15, 2016

Esrb

m



Each personality has a character or two that ends up as a whipping boy cast. Ken Amada makes sense because she is an angry child and these characters are always rough. Yosuke is terrible for Kanji, so he watches again. But … why am I fishing? The worst aspect is that he is quite Lech's as far as his friends are concerned. This is not great and it would be a good reason why his character would not like, but also the Persona series is sometimes quite terrible when it comes to how women treat in general.

Understand, I'm not saying that you are a bad person who likes Persona games. I love persona games. I just admit that they are fighting with this aspect.

Remember, Joker is blackmailing his teacher to be his sexy maid. It is not possible to do it. I think that when it comes to how the series as a whole treats ninerosexual men, you have to cope with the fact that persona is often problematic. Again, the thing is not exclusive to ryes. Things Yusuke and Ann are also terrible, although his intentions are clean.

So only Ryji's hobby is that he has the back of other people, as a supportive friend and showing effortlessly. He is a great character in a problematic game, but there is no point in laying personality sins on his feet!

The last of us part 2: Abby

Abby is a mess, and you also

Abby last of us part 3

Oh, boy, I certainly love this conversation when they appear. Look, for the first two -thirds of the game, Abby is not either around, or as soon as you focus on its perspective, it is unbearable. This lady is absolute mess. But it's a mess, because Abby is another Joel. Not every good figure must start sympathetic. It is a layer of indignation, anger and sadness buried under a strong will to survive. Then he meets Lev and Yara, and like Joel finds himself on the way of redemption.

However, some of you are still too angry that your favorite character brings to see these parallels. And when someone else brings these things, you will try to tell them that it actually deteriorates (for reasons). Then you raise that her muscles are too big. Then you pull out your fanfiction where Joel actually does great advice backflip before it can be hit by a club, and then kills all the people of WLF his sick Karate chops. Or maybe you just start stomping your legs …

I understand it, you are still winding out of the loss of your favorite character, but the truth is that, despite your demands, on the contrary, Abby is a professionally written character. She is defective, but it gives her so much space to grow. This is also what has given Joel so much space to grow. As a direct result we see so much of what Joel Great recontext is. It's a good thing, people!

The last of us part 1: Joel

No, Joel didn't condemn humanity. You're stupid.

Ellie and Joel from the last of us on horseback.

We all heard it at the moment. Joel Damned Humanity! He destroyed a single chance of humanity! It's the biggest monster alive. And look, clearly, Joel is and very defective man in the first last game. This is abundantly clear. He seems to be broken, battered, bruised and emotionally, and he checked out. He's just running to the will to survive. This is often quite hostile; It causes it to behave in a way that is barbaric, but is the product of its environment. The world is a broken mess.

What about the end? Damn, Druckman confirmed they could make a medicine! Well, here's the thing, the game does not mean particularly clear, in fact it is possible to paint fireflies as desperate and incompetent. Hardly holds. As Barthes told you, the author is dead. If Druckman wanted it to be unambiguous, we could write a game to be unambiguous.

And that's all next to it. Even if they get treatment, how do they distribute it? And what is it even good for? How many lives would you actually save? Several dozen a year? Zombies are no longer a problem; People are. The game does it crystal clear. I hate Joel for being selfish, if you want, I think. However, the idea that gaining a vaccine at this point will magically repair a world that is torn to pieces is halfway between ridiculous and stupid. Joel failed to mankind. Humanity would be the same level of the screw in both directions.

Leave a Comment