The idea of ​​a Jurassic Park prequel makes more sense than any reboot

Summary

• A Jurassic Park prequel is overdue that explores the origins of the dinosaur theme park.

• A prequel could address unanswered questions, like the sudden introduction of Isla Sorna.

• Reimagining Jurassic as a horror series would offer new perspectives on the iconic characters.

Not every movie or franchise needs a prequel, but Jurassic Park they definitely deserve one. Each with three films Jurassic Park and jurassic world series, the franchise has no shortage of sequels and soft reboots. But it has not yet dared to explore the origin story of the dinosaur theme park.

Based on Michael Crichton's novels, each film after Steven Spielberg's original Jurassic Park is a straight sequel taking place after the events of the previous film. In some of these sequels, like The lost world and Fallen Kingdomnew elements expanded into a story that was only briefly mentioned in the first film and books.

Yes Jurassic Park Need a Prequel?

Why an origin story would work

It's high time there was a prequel movie or TV series about the events before Jurassic Park. The prequel should be set in the development or construction of the original park. The original 1993 film began as the park nears launch. While it explained almost every technical aspect of how the place came to life, it didn't show viewers how it happened or what it might be hiding beneath the surface.

And that's not a bad thing. In fact, Spielberg's use of show-don't-tell benefited the film, saving the audience from a dump of exposition or over-explaining the plot. However, as it stands, recent jurassic world installments as Fallen Kingdom and Dominion they almost feel like they've run out of story to cover in the current timeline. Going back to the beginning could be a refreshing change for the franchise. (That is, of course, unless Alex Garland proves us wrong with the upcoming one Rebirth film.)

A story for potential Jurassic Prequel

Site B, InGen & Hammond

Potential Jurassic Park a prequel film or TV series could explore many of the ideas detailed in Michael Crichton's novels, such as the introduction of Site B or the people who helped InGen clone the dinosaurs. Details like these weren't mentioned in the first film, but were sprinkled throughout the sequels over time, giving viewers a deeper understanding of how John Hammond brought his vision to life by “sparing no expense”.

The prequel would basically cover the beginnings of InGen and how they managed to clone dinosaur DNA. This would detail the establishment of places like Isla Nublar, Site B, and Jurassic Park San Diego. While Benjamin Lockwood was introduced much later Fallen Kingdom and Dominionviewers could finally get an idea of ​​why exactly he had a falling out with Hammond before the first park opened.

What led to the creation of Jurassic Park?

AND Jurassic Park 0 Before proceeding further

The main argument in favor of a Jurassic Park or jurassic world prequel is that it would take the necessary time to explore elements from the books that were either condensed or left out entirely. The prequel could also explore the very first discovery that led to the rest of the story, as Crichton shared in a featurette for The Lost World: Jurassic Park. This would work especially well as a series as it could lay a solid foundation for the franchise to continue.

What happened was that I did a screenplay about a young graduate student who genetically engineered a single dinosaur from fossil remains. And the script didn't work out. It was too fantastic an event to keep secret, which is what happened in that story.

For example, when The lost world released in 1997, the introduction of Isla Sorna faced criticism because the concept of a second island was unexpected. It was introduced too suddenly, without any mention of what happened to Isla Nublar in the first film. A prequel could address these gaps and provide a stronger narrative foundation for other films to build on. It would also address some unanswered questions and perhaps provide a new perspective on some iconic characters.

The main characters for the Jurassic Park Prequel

Darker shades, different perspectives

John Hammond comes across as a jovial grandfather figure in the movies, but in the books, there's no question that he's a villain. A prequel could shed light on his darker side and show how he may have covered up more deaths than the few we know about. Plus it would ideally include all the characters that are around to build the original Jurassic Park. These include Hammond, Henry Wu, Benjamin Lockwood, and game administrator Robert Muldoon.

More horror, less adventure

Possible Jurassic Park the prequel needs to feel less like an adventure film and more like a horror or thriller. This can be done by showing the incidents that led to certain decisions that were seen in the original films. For example, the electric fences built around the park are an obvious security measure, but imagine if the prequel showed what led them to build them – perhaps with some disturbing incident.

Prequel series or a complete TV reboot?

Jurassic Park: The Movie Vs. Book

In fact, it might not just be a prequel. There is also room for adaptation of the entire series Jurassic Park movies that would be more accurate to the book and better suited to the fan base. This could essentially work as a second adaptation while maintaining a different flavor from the movies. A good example would be how Dune it has been adapted in various cases as films and television shows.

Jurassic Park is no ordinary film – it is embedded in pop culture. Most viewers across generations need no explanation of what happened in the earlier films. Watching a moment like the first successful birth of a baby dinosaur or how the iconic gates of Isla Nublar were built would not only Jurassic Park a fan's dream come true. It also works without the need for complex setup or context.